|
And now faith, hope, and love remain, these three, and the greatest of these is love. I shall walk at liberty, for I have sought your precepts. |
Greg“And they send unto him certain of the Pharisees and of the Herodians, to catch him in his words. And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not? Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it. And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar's. And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him” (Mark 12:13-17).
This passage of scripture has been understood by some people to teach that we have separate obligations in our lives – that we have a duty to the State, and a duty to the Kingdom of God. If Caesar tells us to invade and kill, or to steal and destroy, then we should obey, or at least we are free to obey, and we will not be guilty because we obeyed the Government. We will have done this for our “country”, so it is said, therefore these actions are not unrighteous. I believe this is an absurd misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the text. In the movie Sergeant York, Alvin York is a country boy from Tennessee who was a drunk and liked to fight. On his way to exacting revenge against a man that backed out of selling York a piece of land, York and his mule are struck by lightning, and this led to York’s dramatic “conversion” experience. When the United States entered World War I, York initially requested an exemption by claiming he was a conscientious objector, but his request was denied. The movie depicts York as struggling with the idea of going to war because of the Bible’s prohibition against killing. York was given the opportunity to go home and resolve his inner conflict, and in a highly dramatized scene, York “sees the light” when he reads the following from the Bible: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” The rest is history (sort of). York went all in on the war effort and was hailed as a national hero for his feats. As for the details of York’s life, it is hard to say what is fact and what is fiction. Later in his life, York denied that he had ever been a conscientious objector. “I never was a conscientious objector”, York wrote in his diary. He also never mentioned the lightning and the mule in his conversion experience. (Source) In York’s diary, he seemed to be a God-fearing man, but it also appears that he fell prey to war propaganda, and that despite his inclination that killing was wrong, the aforementioned statement from the Bible was taken to mean that his country’s call for him to kill trumped God’s command for him not to kill (the topic of defending oneself from an aggressor is something different altogether; my argument here is against engaging in war for the State). As such, this story has been used to propagandize young Americans to join the military for many years, and since many of them are more influenced by Hollywood dramatizations than the scriptures, it has had its intended effect. What does it mean to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s? Does this mean that we are to submit to the orders of State officials? What if they say it is for the “good of the country?” Some people argue, and I agree, that the US had no business sending men to die or to kill in the conflict York participated in. The US was not in danger. No military force was capable of crossing the ocean and launching a serious attack on the American people, but the US Government sent many Americans to their death nonetheless. If the Lord Jesus meant that we are obligated to render unto Caesar whatever is good for Caesar, then it was wrong to oppose the Germans who were rendering unto Hitler what he demanded. They were merely “obeying the powers that be.” That in and of itself proves the interpretation to be false. But, someone says, America’s involvement was righteous; it was only the enemy that was doing evil. The US government wasn’t torturing and murdering millions of Jews in this instance, as was Hitler, but that does not mean their motivations and intentions were righteous. I would suggest reading books about the World Wars that reject the Government propaganda that is foisted upon people in the public schooling system. A good start would be Patrick Buchanan’s book "Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War." So what was this interaction between the Lord and these people all about? The previous chapter tells us that the scribes and the chief priests were looking for a way to destroy Christ, for they feared him, because he was drawing the people away from their control (11:18). They wanted to take him by force, but they feared what the people would do, so they went away and sent some of the Herodians and Pharisees to try to catch him in his words. They knew that taxation was a touchy subject, so they asked him if it was lawful to give tribute to Caesar or not. If he said yes, it would disappoint the people who were being drawn to him. If he said no, then they could refer him to the Roman authorities for punishment. The Lord knew they were up to no good and he told them to bring him a coin. He asked them whose image was on the coin. They answered, it was Caesar’s. The Lord then stated: “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.” This was not a call to yield to God and Caesar. I believe it was a call to choose one or the other. Will you follow God no matter the earthly consequences? Or will you trust in the securities of the State? Jeffrey Barr tells us the following: “The denarius in question would have been issued by the Emperor Tiberius, whose reign coincided with Jesus' ministry….” “….The denarius was truly the emperor's property: he used it to pay his soldiers, officials, and suppliers; it bore the imperial seal; it differed from the copper coins issued by the Roman Senate, and it was also the coin with which subjected peoples, in theory, were required to pay the tribute. Tiberius even made it a capital crime to carry any coin stamped with his image into a bathroom or a brothel. In short, the denarius was a tangible representation of the emperor's power, wealth, deification, and subjugation.” “….The front of the denarius shows a profiled bust of Tiberius crowned with the laurels of victory and divinity. Even a modern viewer would immediately recognize that the person depicted on the coin is a Roman emperor. Circumscribed around Tiberius is an abbreviation, "TI CAESAR DIVI AUG F AUGUSTUS," which stands for "Tiberius Caesar Divi August Fili Augustus," which, in turn, translates, "Tiberius Caesar, Worshipful Son of the God, Augustus." “….The coin of the Tribute Episode is a fine specimen of Roman propaganda. It imposes the cult of emperor worship and asserts Caesar's sovereignty upon all who transact with it.” “…Jesus tells His interrogators, "Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's; and to God, the things that are God's." This response begs the question of what is licitly God's and what is licitly Caesar's.” “….With one straightforward counter-question, Jesus skillfully points out that the claims of God and Caesar are mutually exclusive. If one's faith is in God, then God is owed everything; Caesar's claims are necessarily illegitimate, and he is therefore owed nothing. If, on the other hand, one's faith is in Caesar, God's claims are illegitimate, and Caesar is owed, at the very least, the coin which bears his image.” (Read the entire article here) Taxes were the topic of discussion in the passage, but this incident points to a much bigger issue. To whom to do you pledge your allegiance? What do we owe Caesar? What do we owe the State? We may pay taxes to avoid jail, but this does not make paying taxes holy. If we are to give the State whatever the State demands, where does it stop? Should we give them all of our money and resources if they demand it, making us unable to provide for our families? Should we give them our children so they can be educated, drafted, and regimented for the State’s purposes? Should we kill when they say kill? Should we believe them when they call people from other nations our enemies? Should we surrender to them our ability to protect our families from harm? I believe it is a grievous error to take these words of the Lord as teaching anything other than the fact that we must choose whom we will serve – Caesar or God. We are to render unto God what is God’s. And what do we owe him? Everything. What do we owe the Caesars of the world? Nothing. Though we may obey the laws of the State to a point, such as paying taxes, we do this to avoid unnecessary trouble, not because the State has a right to our resources, and not because it has a right to claim our allegiance. How do we choose God over Caesar? By giving our allegiance to his Son, the Christ, and his Kingdom, rather than to the antichrist kingdoms of men.
0 Comments
GregIn the US today, many have decided that the State should be our brother’s keeper. God’s charitable purposes through churches have been crowded out by a dependence on State solutions for the needy. This has resulted in many local churches not carrying out this intended church function, and this causes the poor to miss out on God’s benevolent purposes through the people of Christ. The Bible says:
I have shewed you all things, how that so labouring ye ought to support the weak, and to remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he said, It is more blessed to give than to receive (Acts 20:35). Then said he also to him that bade him, When thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor thy rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompence be made thee. But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind: And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just (Luke 14:12-14). He that oppresseth the poor reproacheth his Maker: but he that honoureth him hath mercy on the poor (Proverbs 14:31). God has called upon Christians (individually and corporately) to be their brothers’ keepers, not to turn them over to State departments and programs. State welfare provides money apart from morality, by stealing from some and redistributing it indiscriminately to others. True Christian charity not only provides goods to the needy, it rescues people from the streets, delivers hope, restores families, and helps people position themselves to be their own providers. People need more than a handout that they can get from a State politician - they need to know that someone cares. Churches must obey God’s instructions to assist the poor, the sick, the heartbroken, and the outcast (James 2). GregThe worship of the military has led many professing Christians to betray the Kingdom of God. Many professing Christians will decry the abortion of American babies, but they do not say a word when the military kills people in other countries (including women and children) for the US Empire. God’s will for the people of other nations to come to repentance is ignored by many professing Christians for the sake of “spreading democracy” and maintaining US hegemony. In fact, Christians in other countries are killed due to the policies of American interventionism, or their homes are destroyed, and some professing Christians will ask God to bless the military as it wreaks havoc in their lives. Many churchgoers are more influenced by American tribalism than they are the teachings of Christ.
Pointing to the missions that God gave to Israel in the Old Testament is not a justification for claiming the US has a mission from God to police the world and destroy people in other countries. I believe that the principle of defending one’s family from violence is present in the scriptures, but this should not be equated with the militaristic nature of the State. For anyone who takes this matter seriously, there is no doubt that the US is at the top of this list, as evidenced by the military’s invasion of numerous countries over the past century and a half, its foreign bases in countries all over the world, its proxy wars, and the fact that the US Government has sold weaponry to some of the most repressive government regimes on earth. US military personnel have made many orphans and widows, not because their own homes were being invaded or because their families were in danger, but because the State commanded them to invade, occupy, kill, and destroy. It is certainly disturbing to hear some professing Christians attempt to defend the fact that the US military dropped two atomic bombs on the men, women, and children of Japan, or that it was justifiable to bomb and slaughter and starve the men, women, and children of Iraq, to name just two examples. It is one thing to protect one’s family from harm, it is another to invade other territories and kill for the State because it is one’s “job.” The interventionism of the US military does not provide us with freedom, though this claim is made by propagandists who stand to benefit from US militarism. Christ does not call his people to invade and kill people in other countries, or to spread certain forms of government, but to lay their lives down for him and the gospel. Christ is the King of kings, yet he forbade his followers from killing for him. Yet some would have us believe we should kill for a president, a congress, for “democracy” (majoritarian rule), or for “our country.” Engaging in war for the monopolistic, interventionist, imperialistic State is immoral and unjustifiable for the Christian. There was a day when the disciples James and John, referring to their enemies, asked the Lord Jesus: "Lord, wilt thou that we command fire to come down from heaven, and consume them, even as Elias did? But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of. For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village." Christ’s kingdom is not of this world, therefore the kingdom to which true Christians belong is not of this world. Those who are following Christ will be living sacrifices, seeking the conversion of non-Christians, not their destruction. Making the claim that military personnel that kill are only obeying orders, when it has nothing to do with actual defense, is no justification before God. Murder is evil whether it is done by an individual on the street, or an individual or group of individuals in uniform. |
Greg and KariWe are a Christian couple committed to following the one true God, the Father, and the one Lord Messiah, his only begotten Son. Categories
All
|